ADAPTABILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF TOMATO VARIETIES IN THE FOREST-STEPPE OF UKRAINE

  • N. V. Vorobіova Uman National University of Horticulture
Keywords: tomato, variety, leaf, leaf surface, yield, fruit quality

Abstract

Abstract. The expansion of the assortment of vegetable plants allows to increase the variety and production of domestic vegetable products, in particular, tomatoes. The article examines and proves the research results that the variety significantly affects the formation of tomato productivity and can minimize the negative impact of environmental factors. The purpose. The aim of the research was to study the agrobiological features of crop formation of different varieties of tomato. Methods. Experimental studies were carried out in 2018–2020. On the experimental field of the Uman NUS. The main research methods are used in the work: analysis and comparison, experimental, calculated. We studied tomato varieties of Ukrainian selection Lahidnyi (control), Anita, Aisan, Vulkan, Geyser, Daruna, Classic, Liubymyi, Myroliubivskyi, Oberih, Udav, Fizuma, Khoriv, Chudo. Results. Comparison of the number of generative organs of plants showed that during the growing season a larger number of brushes was formed on plants of the Horeb variety – 23.1 pcs/plant, which exceeded the control – 20.8 pcs/plant. The highest yields were found in the varieties Vulkan and Khoriv – 63.0 t/ha, as well as Miracle – 62.8 t/ha, which significantly exceeded the control – 56.0 t/ha. The Daruna variety approached this indicator and had a yield of 56.9 t/ha. In varieties Anita and Oberig, the yield was lower than the control by 1.4–1.5 t/ha, in varieties Myroliubivskyi and Aisan – by 8.3–9.5 t/ha. The variety Oberig had high chemical indicators, the fruits of which accumulated 6.2% of dry soluble substance versus 5.1% control Lahidnyi of sugar content, varieties Khoriv, Oberig and Myroliubivskyi prevailed – 3.4, 3.9 and 3.8%, respectively, which is significantly higher than the control. In terms of the amount of vitamin C, the varieties Oberig and Chudo were distinguished, in which a high sugar-acid coefficient was found – 9.4 compared to control (7.5). In varieties Khoriv and Myroliubivskyi, it was at the level of 5.6 and 5.8, respectively. Conclusion. Thus, as a result of research it was found that the most adaptive and productive are the varieties of tomato Chudo, Vulkan and Khoriv, with a yield of 62.8–63.0 t/ha and high biochemical composition.

References

Bondarenko, H.L., Yakovenko, K.I. Metodyka doslidnoyi spravy v ovochivnytstvi i bashtannytstvi. [Methods of research in vegetable growing and melon growing]. Kharkiv: Osnova, 2001. 369 p. [in Ukrainian].

FAOSTAT, 2014, Food balance sheets. http://faostat.fao.org (dostęp 26.09.2020). [in English].

Gama, D., Ferreira, K., Souza, V., Yuri, J., Mesquita, A. (2020). Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environment. Bioscience Journal, 36, 10.14393/BJ-v36n5a2020-40011. [in English].

Ingallina, C., Sobolev, A., Circi, S., Spano, M., Giusti, A., Mannina, L. (2020). New Hybrid Tomato Cultivars: An NMR-Based Chemical Character ization. Applied Sciences, 10, 1887. 10.3390/app10051887. [in English].

Joshi, B., Davis, J., Panthee, D. (2011). How we Improve and Develop Tomato Cultivars. 10.13140/RG.2.2.12728.96001. [in English].

Kravchenko V.A. (2007). Pomidor. Selektsiya, nasinnytstvo, tekhnolohiyi. [Tomato. Breeding, seed production, technologies]. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka, 2007. 405 p. [in Ukrainian].

Malaker A., Hossain,A.K.M., Akter T., Khan Md. (2016). Variation in morphological attributes and yield of tomato cultivars. Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries, 3, 287. 10.3329/ralf.v3i2.29349. [in English].

Marx, M, Stuparic, M, Schieber, A. et al. (2003). Effect of thermal processing on trans-cisisomerization of b-carotene in carrot juices and carotene containing preparations. Food Chemistry, 83, 609–617. [in English].

Menezes, K., Sanches, A., Santos, G., Oliveira, A., Cordeiro, C. (2019). Physicochemical and sensorial characterization of table tomato cultivars. Revista Brasileira de Tecnologia Aplicada nas Ciências Agrárias. 11. 10.5935/PAeT.V11.N3.01. [in English].

Myazyna, L.A. Byolohycheskye osobennosty y kompleksnaya otsenka lezhkosposobnykh form tomata: Avtoref. dis. kand. s.-kh. nauk: 06.01.06, 06.01.05. [Biological features and a comprehensive assessment of the resilient forms of tomato]. M., 1997. 24 p. [in Russian].

Naher N., Uddin M.K., Ahamed K.U., Alam A.K.M.M. (2020). Performances of tomato cultivars in coastal areas based on GGE biplot analysis. Progressive Agriculture, 31, 94-103. 10.3329/pa.v31i2.50714. [in English].

Pastukhova, A., Petrov, A., Tsvetkova, V., Maslenikova, V. (2021). The responsiveness of tomato cultivar «spock» on the use of biological and mineral fertilizers. Innovations and Food Safety, 108-116. 10.31677/2072-6724-2020-30-4-108-116. [in English].

Rohanina, V.Ye. (2013). Planuvannya rozvytku ovochivnytstva na osnovi innovatsiy. [Vegetable development planning based on innovations]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu im. V.V. Dokuchayeva. Ser.: Ekonomichni nauky, № 8, pp. 132–137. [in Ukrainian]

Rosa, A., Fernando S., Cardoso, J. (2019). Performance and selection of tomato cultivars for organic cultivation in greenhouse. Revista Ceres, 66, 94-101. 10.1590/0034-737x201966020003. [in English].

Zou, Q. & Zhang, Z. & Zhang, Y. & Wang, T. & Zhu, H. & Li, H. (2017). A new tomato cultivar 'Liaofen 2'. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 44, 805-806. 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0666. [in English].

Published
2021-07-23
How to Cite
VorobіovaN. (2021). ADAPTABILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF TOMATO VARIETIES IN THE FOREST-STEPPE OF UKRAINE. Vegetable and Melon Growing, (69), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.32717/0131-0062-2021-69-79-88